ALLEGED SEX OFFENCE CHARGES

Man charged with rape of child
Posted Fri Apr 9, 2010 1:43pm AEST

Brisbane man Massimo "Max" Sica has been indicted on 20 child sex charges in the District Court.

The charges include one count of maintaining a sexual relationship with a girl under 16 years, two counts of rape, six counts of unlawful carnal knowledge with a child and nine counts of indecent dealing with a child.

It is alleged the girl was aged between 9 and 13 at the time of the offences, between 2004 and 2008.

The matter has been adjourned until May 10 in the Brisbane District Court.

TMC AND DOUSER...............................
This is the latest newspaper article about Max Sica and the alleged sex offence charges.

If anyone of you was at the committal regarding these alleged sex charges then you must have also heard this................

The girl who is making the accusations against Max Sica says that she has had full on intercourse with him (a fully grown adult) at least once a week or once a fortnight from the age of 9 till the age of 13. She alleges it started in 2004 and continued until 2008. When police questioned her the first time about these so called allegations, she said that since her friend was telling her that her stepfather was molesting her, she wanted to know more and be closer to her so she made up a story that she was molested too, and since Max Sica was known because of all the publicity on him, she used his name and made it all up.

Police later questioned her and she then said that it was true, that Max Sica had sex with her for at least four years and regularly.

A medical examination was done on this girl and this is what was found:
Her hymen if fully intact, no scaring, no trauma, no tearing. She is a virgin.

Im not an expert but i am a woman and there is no way on earth you could still be like that if you have had sex with a fully grown man and you a child for all those years and on many, many occassions. This is just what the medical examination shows. There is so much other evidence that i cannot mention now because of pending legal issues.

Another thing is this.... Max Sica has been under police surveillence since the murders occurred in 2003. This was also shown to be true at the committal for the Singh murders. House was fully bugged, phones were tapped, cars were bugged, gps surveillance was used and he was followed around by undercover police. I do not think that police would know such a thing and not do anything about it. This is why Max Sica was then charged with the Singh murders on the 30th of December 2008. Nearly six years after. Nothing had changed, no new evidence had come out or was made available, no smoking gun, no miracle witness.

You dont have to believe me if i say he did not and would never ever harm a child in this way or anyother way. The FACTS are all out in the open. By the way, the other girl who was saying that her stepfather was molesting her etc,,,, she told police it was not true and that was the end of that. JUSTICE? Not if your name happens to be Massimo Sica.

COMMENT MADE.....

speakupnbeheardJuly 25, 2012 12:11 PM

We had a situation where my partner was accused of molesting his own daughter (aged 4 at the time) after his recent marital breakup. The child is a slow developer and her speech at that stage was very limited. We would see the child on a fortnightly basis with bruises and telling us stories* and games* of her being "hurt". It got to a point where this could no longer be ignored. My partner was advised to take her to the juvenile department of the police dept; they questioned and watched as father and child related to one another. The mother stormed into the police dept with her solicitor (straight from work after being notified her child was suspected of being molested)and was told to take the child to hospital for an examination. This did not occur. Mother waited 3 days later, then went to her normal GP where no vaginal examinations occurred, and the child was able to CLEARLY state that her father had "hurt" her. Mother and doctor gave her a big hug and told her that she was a good girl. When DOCS spoke with the child, where the child once again gave her spiel (exact same words she gave to the doctor), they too gave her a big cuddle and told her she was a good girl. For a little girl craving for love and attention, she was taught that if she said these words, she would get cuddles and kisses. We had to have supervised visits for approx. 6mths. DOCS wanted my partner to go to pedophile group meetings; this disgusted him and he refused. They threatened that if he didn't, he wouldn't be allowed to see his daughter at all, and that it would hurt his case; he still refused to go - he was not a pedophile - and being put into a room with pedophiles would have riled him - and for him to have to listen to what they said would have outraged him even more. It wasn't until just before court that the child was interviewed by a counsellor; once the child gave the spiel(by rote)she said "Do you like my pretty necklace it's a butterfly?" (both sentences) all in the one breath, the counsellor's alarm bells rang. It cost us over $62,000 to clear my partners name through the court system and to be able to see his daughter without supervision. The person doing the "hurting" fled to NZ when we went to the police in the first instance. Police were wanting to question him but never got the chance. 7 years on - we know that the mother had taught the child what to say - we also know that her mother had an inkling of what was going on but too scared to say - plus - it was a good way to "get back" at her husband. DOCS wanted my partners head on a platter. Why would the so-called pedophile take a child to the police to tell them she is being molested?!! We have life-inexperienced school kids making detrimental life altering decisions (about us) in our justice systems. Also....the media....the justice system....just want someone to blame. It makes a good story, and it makes our politicians look good....I'm sorry, but that is a high price for us innocent to pay.